Sakai, S., et al. (2017) J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 19(4): 1295-1313
Authors: Sakai, S.; Yano, J.; Hirai, Y.; Asari, M.; Yanagawa, R.; Matsuda, T.; Yoshida, H.; Yamada, T.; Kajiwara, N.; Suzuki, G.; Kunisue, T.; Takahashi, S.; Tomoda, K.; Wuttke, J.; Mählitz, P.; Rotter, VS.; Grosso, M.; Astrup, TF.; Cleary, J.; Oh,Gil‑Jong.; Liu, L.; Li, L.; Ma, Hwong wen, Chi, NK.; Moore, S.
Abstract
Although the 2Rs (reduce and reuse) are considered high-priority approaches, there has not been
enough quantitative research on effective 2R management. The purpose of this paper is to provide information obtained through the International Workshop in Kyoto, Japan, on 11-13 November 2015, which included invited experts and researchers in several countries who were in charge of 3R policies, and an additional review of 245 previous studies. It was found that, regarding policy development, the decoupling between environmental pressures and economy growth was recognized as an essential step towards a sustainable society. 3R and resource management policies, including waste prevention, will play a crucial
role. Approaches using material/substance flow analyses have become sophisticated enough to describe the fate of resources and/or hazardous substances based on human activity and the environment, including the final sink. Lifecycle assessment has also been developed to evaluate waste prevention activities. Regarding target products for waste prevention, food loss is one of the waste fractions with the highest priority because its countermeasures have significant upstream and downstream effects. Persistent organic pollutants and hazardous compounds should also be taken into account in the situation where recycling activities are globally widespread for the promotion of a material-cycling society.
Published online: 21 February 2017